Sunday, December 9, 2012

Draft Action Research Project Progress Report


Implementation of Power Standards:  Does it Increase Student Achievement?


Needs Assessment
West Orange-Stark Elementary has performed below state average in Mathematics.  According to TEA, 63% of students from West Orange-Stark Elementary met standard in Mathematics in 2011-2012, while the state average was 83%.  Our African American students account for 63% of our students, which is our most numerous subgroup.  These students were our lowest performing subgroup.  After disaggregating the data and looking at scores from individual standards, I found that in third and fourth grade, students scored 70% or higher on only one standard for each grade level, while in fifth grade students did not scored 70% or higher on any standards.  In all three tested grade levels, male students achieved higher scores than females.  The average difference between male and female students was 3.33%.  Through analyzing these results, we decided that teachers need to prioritize a set of content standards so they can identify the content standards at which they will devote powerful, thoroughgoing instruction, and then they need to formally and systematically assess students mastery of those high-priority content standards.  


Objectives and Vision of the Action Research Project
Through the implementation of Power Standards, teachers will prioritize a set of content standards and insure a deep understanding of those standards.  The main objective of this project is to narrow the focus and teach the most important standards in their entirety.  All standards not identified as essential will be taught within the context of the identified Power Standards.  Instruction will transition from the traditional “mile wide, inch deep” way of teaching to “inch wide, mile deep.”  My vision is for students to become completely proficient with the identified Power Standards and be able to use transfer knowledge from the concepts of the Power Standards to understand and problem solve with concepts from the supporting standards. 


Review of the Literature and Action Research Strategy
Although I have not completely finished my literature review, I have read Power Standards: Identifying the Standards that Matter the Most, and I have began reading Balanced Assessment:  From Formative to Summative.  Both books pertain to Power Standards and why they are effective and beneficial. 

To begin the process of implementing, I researched the idea of Power Standards and shared what I found with my site supervisor and Assistant Superintendent.  When they approved the project, I conducted a training for our third, fourth and fifth grade math teachers.  I explained how to use Power Standards and why it would be beneficial for our students.  Our teachers then individually made initial selections for their grade levels based on their professional judgment.  At this time, I instructed them to consider looking at all standards through the common criteria of:  endurance, leverage, and readiness for the next level of learning.  Next, the teachers referenced the state requirements and state test data from the previous year.  They modified their selections as needed, then compared selections with the other teachers in their grade levels.  After collaborating, each grade level presented their selections to the other grade levels, then they were able to vertically collaborate and make needed adjustments.  The teachers then turned their selections in to me and justified why each selection was made.  Together we discussed and once again adjusted as needed.  Next, I presented the selections to the campus academic coordinator, the principal, and the assistant superintendent.  They each were able to give input, and the final selections were made.  Once we were all content with what standards were chosen to be Power Standards, the teachers began to implement them into their instruction.  The identified standards are being taught 75% of the time in classrooms, while the remaining standards are being taught within the context of these standards. 


Articulate the Vision
To communicate the vision of my action research project I have met with our campus CILT team and our district academic leadership team.  In each of these meetings, I articulated the relevant data emphasizing the need for improvement and expressing the potential Power Standards have for our math department.  I have also met with the teachers involved in the implementation and walked them through each step providing substantial assistance.  As new data has become available, I have presented it to all stake holders.


Manage the organization
Third, fourth and fifth grade math teachers are responsible for implementing Power Standards in their instruction and recording their means of implementation.  Prior to creating lesson plans for each cycle, the math teachers within each grade level and I work together to look at the curriculum and determine when and how each standard will be taught.  We determine how much time will be spent on each standard and what supporting standards will be taught within the context of each Power Standard.  After teaching supporting standards within the context of Power Standards, the teachers record anecdotal notes expressing their conception of the student learning that took place.  Teachers also record notes and results from formative assessments.  After each cycle assessment, I am responsible for analyzing and disaggregating the data, then sharing what I find with the teachers and administration.  At that time, I meet with each grade level to discuss the anecdotal notes they have taken and the new data.  If a specific class performs particularly well on any given standard, we will discuss what was different in that class and together we will learn from that teacher and create action plans accordingly. 


Manage Operations
To lead the operations of the project and set priorities, we put student achievement as our priority.  After every decision that was made, we referred back to the data and confirmed that the choices we were making were going to provide the best opportunity for improved student achievement.  Throughout the entire project, we have used a collaborative approach.  No decision has been made by one single person, rather, we have capitalized on cooperation and thoroughly explored all choices from various perspectives.


Respond to Community Interest and Needs
My action research project will serve the needs of all students by giving students a firm foundation to expand their knowledge on.  Through the use of Power Standards, teachers will more easily be able to provide students with differentiated instruction, and will more easily be able to identify the specific needs of each child. 

Target Audience



The target audience I want to share my action research project results with includes academically struggling schools and curriculum writers.  The purpose of Power Standards is to teach inch wide, mile deep rather than the traditional mile wide, inch deep.  Power Standards also provide opportunity to teach supporting standards within the context of the identified Power Standards resulting in a deeper understanding of what is most important.   Schools that are struggling academically have educational gaps and continue to create more gaps by rushing through the curriculum in order to teach students to every concept in isolation.  By sharing my research and data with curriculum writers, they will be able to write a curriculum that has a narrower focus, and addresses the less important standards within the context of the most important ones.   

5397 Week 3 Web Conference Reflection



From listening to this week’s recording of the conference, I now have a clearer vision of what is expected this week.  Although I have not been able to attend a web conference live during this class, I really enjoy being able to watch the recordings.  I feel more connected with the course and more confident with what is expected each week.  

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Sharing My Work


To provide background information and share the design of the inquiry, I will deliver a presentation to the school staff during one of the staff development days right before the school year begins.  This presentation will include what led me to this study and how the monitoring of the research will progress.  I will also inform the staff of ways they can become involved or follow the progress of the study. 
As the research project continues, I will blog and tweet for others to follow and post comments and questions.  Each six weeks, the teachers involved in the study will compile their anecdotal notes and discuss the research project.  I will also collect behavior and benchmark data then share it with the teachers and CILT members each six weeks.  The data will be presented through bar graphs and summative statements.  Once every 2 or 3 months, data will be formally presented to the entire staff during staff development meetings. 
Each six weeks, claims or assertion will be transcribed, and then revised as more new data is collected.  As the year ends, I will select the most powerful pieces of data, and compose a document for my concluding thoughts.  This will be shared with our campus staff and district administrators along with my twitter and blog followers.   

Research Plan


Gender Based Classes
Goal: To improve student achievement through gender
          based classes
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation

Create two fourth grade all male classes of various academic abilities


Principal, Assistant Principals Academic Coordinator, Literacy Coach, Numeracy coach (Lamar Intern)


May-June, 2012

Third grade STAAR and benchmark results,  student cumulative folders

Completion, CILT approval

Obtain parental consent for each student selected to be a part of the study


Academic Coordinator, Literacy Coach, Numeracy coach (Lamar Intern)


May-June, 2012

Permissions slips

Informative presentation

Completion, site supervisor approval

Gather previous assessment scores for each student involved in the study


Lamar Intern

June-August, 2012

Third grade STAAR and benchmark results

Completion, peer review, site supervisor approval

Analyze Mathematics, Reading, and ELA benchmark results each six weeks


Literacy Coach, Numeracy coach (Lamar Intern)

August, 2012-June 2013

Benchmark assessment results in Eduphoria

Completion, peer review, site supervisor approval

Analyze behavior data each six weeks


Assistant Principals, Lamar Intern

August, 2012-June 2013

Referral reports, teacher tracking charts


Completion, peer review, site supervisor approval

Compile the weekly anecdotal notes taken by teachers involved in the research.  


Teachers, Lamar Intern

August, 2012-June 2013

Notes taken by teachers

Completion, peer review, site supervisor approval

Observe gender based and heterogeneously grouped classes then record and compare observations


Principal, Assistant Principals Academic Coordinator, Literacy Coach, Numeracy coach (Lamar Intern)


August, 2012-June 2013

Observation forms

Completion, peer review, site supervisor approval

Analyze Mathematics, Reading, and ELA STAAR results


Lamar Intern

May 2013

STAAR assessment results

Completion, peer review, site supervisor approval

Reflect on progress and thoughts regarding the gender based classes


Principal, Assistant Principals Academic Coordinator, Literacy Coach, Numeracy coach (Lamar Intern), CILT, Teachers involved in study


August, 2012-June 2013

Anecdotal notes, observations, benchmark results, behavior data

Completion, peer review, site supervisor approval

Plan for the future


Principal, Assistant Principals Academic Coordinator, Literacy Coach, Numeracy coach (Lamar Intern), CILT, Teachers involved in study


May 2013


Completion, CILT approval, site supervisor approval